Hoe’Tell News |

HotelPimp

You can’t read about the sex trade without reading about the scourge of human trafficking. Above all other criticisms of prostitution, this is the big one. Nothing makes people panic more than the idea that their daughter or sister or wife could be whisked away by masked foreigners and forced to fuck strangers for money in another country. The uptight can claim it leads to other crimes and disease and all that shit that maybe the stats don’t back up fully, but damn…human trafficking is rough. If it was real, anyway.

Turns out the Guardian paper in the UK just blew the lid off of the human trafficking bullshit powder keg they’d been sitting on for quite a while over there. The end result of a massive law enforcement investigation that including every single law enforcement agency in the entire country, special agencies and the government is that not one single person who ever forced anyone into the sex trade was found. Not one.

Despite politicians and media claiming thousands of people are brought into the country each and every year to be forced into a prostitution ( a claim echoed in the US, in Canada and in pretty much every Western nation), there’s actually little evidence it happens at all and it’s likely real numbers are extremely smaller than those tossed around in the media. The so called information comes from misquoted, misunderstood or completely fabricated sources. It’s sensationalism and piss poor journalism at its best.

As it happens, UK law enforcement originally claimed it had achieved a massive success in its bid to end human trafficking by making over 500 arrests. Once the Guardian got a hold of the official documentation, that number changed. Over 100 were clerical errors. They never really happened. That brought the number down to just over 400. About half of those arrested were women, few implicated in any kind of trafficking. 153 had been released even before the program was called a success, 106 with no charges filed and 47 for minor offenses. 73 were charged for immigration breaches, and 76 got hit with drug charges.

In the end, 96 people were arrested for trafficking, 67 were charged and 47 never made it to court. In fact, only 22 were prosecuted, including two women rescued as victims. 15 men and women were ultimately convicted, according to the program’s definition of trafficking, which includes transporting a sex worker who is willingly going along with you. 10 of the people convicted fell under this definition, and had forced no one into the sex trade. That leaves five people, two of whom were in prison months before the crackdown even began. The other three were convicted at the end of an investigation started in 2006, a year before the program began.

So in the end, no one was found to have been a human trafficker as the result of a massive, cross country sting operation that investigated over 800 brothels and other establishments, raiding sex workers and those who work with them. 5 people, over the span of a few years, were charged with real, legitimate trafficking. Is it a problem? Of course, in much the way supervillains are a problem. It’s real, but it’s not nearly as bad as the movies make it seem sometimes.

More and more U.S. sex workers are heading south of the border (you shut up) in order to seek work in a safer, regulated and potentially more lucrative environment than on U.S. streets - even despite recent reports that suggest their patrons could do a little better when it comes to wrapping it up.

An article about this new phenomenon contains a few instances of unintentional hilarity, not the least of which was the mention that a seasoned Mexican prostitute originally thought the American prostitutes (one of whom was described as wearing a sheer red and white top and leggings) were simply tourists. But, no. That wasn’t a fannypack.

The Tijuana-based prostitututes, some of whom belong to “Las Magdalenas,” a group aimed at enforcing sex workers’ rights, say the U.S. women tend to be friendlier, although many speak not a word of Spanish.

Another new trend that the sex workers must compete with is the influx of Mexican housewives - usually middle-aged or older - who also work the streets of Tijuana for extra spending cash. Some women have even been seen bringing their grandchildren into hotels that charge by the hour, presumably because they cannot afford to have someone watch them while they work.

One prostitute explained that Tijuana has always been something of a land of opportunity, even beyond the “Zona Norte” where prostitution is legal and (supposedly) regulated:

Tijuana has always been a haven for people seeking work. In the past, the unemployment rate has been 2%, ie well below the national unemployment. Now, even though unemployment is at 8%, it is still very attractive to many people, even the homeless across the border looking for work here.

So if you’re an American tourist strolling Tijuana in a pair of Lucite sandals and an ill-fitting tank top (like you do), you might end up bringing home a little extra money. Just don’t bite the worm.

Mortalez Head pimp

Here’s my contribution to the ever re-visited issue of what does or should GFE and PSE mean.

GFE (Girlfriend Experience)

Essentially, the provider is going to treat you like you were her boyfriend for the duration of your time together. There is a promised level of imtimacy that you should feel close and comfortable with the lady. Your time together should feel more like a date than a one night stand. In some little way she should make you feel special. This seems to be the only consensus on what GFE means. I think practically everyone can agree on this.

In my opinion however the term no longer has any meaning. The problem is that almost every provider calls herself a GFE. When looking through the ads, I no longer notice or care whether a girl claims to be a GFE or not. Anyone who hobbies extensively or reads the reviews often knows that it’s rare to have the experience that I described above. I’m not saying the majority of encounters reviewed are bad for the hobbyist, only that it doesn’t happen that often.

Sure, if you see a provider a number of times and become regular associates, I don’t doubt that a special relationship (professional, of course) will probably develop. However, I wouldn’t expect a GFE treatment the very first time I meet a girl. I will admit that every girl I’ve been with has jabbered my ear off, in that sense I certainly do feel like she’s my girlfriend!

Part of the problem too is the ambiguity of what it should feel like to have a girlfriend for an hour. Is it set-in-stone for how a girlfriend should make you feel? Nope. Since the general definition above is purely of an an emotional character (how you feel), there is wide room for what it should mean. One hobbyist’s or provider’s GFE is probably not another’s.

PSE (Pornstar experience)

You are the star of your very own porno movie! Twangy seventies music is playing in the background as you bump uglies. CHICKA CHICKA BWAH BWAH! No need for too much description of this one, we’ve all seen our fair share of porn.

There is greater consensus on what PSE entails. If a girl promises GFE and doesn’t allow kissing; not everyone would agree that you’ve been jipped. A girl promises PSE and will only give a handjob… that’s a flat out rip-off. Don’t tell me that it’s not! More and more actual porn actresses are providing so I guess anything they offer is technically PSE. But there is undoubtedly a higher level of expectation for the services rendered.

PSE is a promise of wreckless and taboo sex. Your sexual gratification should be of paramount importance to the provider. There is a greater demand placed on this sort of thing so the prices are a premium. I’ve seen several girls who have normal rates and PSE rates. If you want the full-meal-deal, you’re going to have to pay for it.

Now, why is there greater consensus on that PSE means, but not GFE? What’s being promised is more in terms of certain sex acts rather than a general mood or feeling. It’s easier to quantify that.

When I think I’ll be visiting a new city soon, I start researcing TER and making a list. I sort of have three tiers, with each one being more preferable than the lower ones. In all cases, I only consider girls that I find to be considerably attractive. I admit that I might be more of a beauty-freak than most hobbyists. In my defense, i only have a limited amount of funds at my disposal. If I’m going to spend my hard-earned money on an encounter, I want it to be as fantasy-fulfilling as possible. (I’ll have to start a new blog about the women I find attractive…this blog is getting a bit long…)

The following is how I define different levels of service.

1. A-Level: These girls provide at least the minimum of service that I would consider seeing them. Most providers I consider worth seeing fall in this category.

• No rush. I don’t want to be hustled out after my first pop.
• Multiple pops must be allowed. Basically, that means 2 per hour. 3 would be cool if I can get it back up. 4 would be a record for me in one hour…she’s definitely better than A-level then!
• Sex. Not just a hand job. I can do that myself, thank you! This includes vaginal and going down on me. It sucks when a provider doesn’t suck…can they even be called a provider then?
• Real pic. I want to know what she looks like beforehand. Even if reviewers claim she is still hot even though the pic is fake, I’m wary.
• Reviews. I’m not going to TOFTT. I don’t bring along enough cash for bail.
• Non-CraigsList ad. Again, I don’t have enough for bail.
• Flat rates. I hate to be upselled. Lets have all business taken care of before we get started. Along with this, I won’t see a girl who hustles for tips. Very unprofessional and akward if I don’t think she deserves it or I don’t have enough on me.
• No drivers or roomates. The only person I want around is her, or the other girls I paid for

2. GFE: These girls fit my description of what a GFE should be. They are everything an A-Level girl is and more. Most providers do not fall in this category.

• Not a clock watcher. Not only is she no rush, it’s not a big deal if your time goes a bit over. I never expect or ask for it, but it’s always appreciated.
• Kissing. LFK or DFK, either one. This is a biggie for GFE. Nothing is more intimate than kissing.
• DATY. Not a lot of girls are cool with this. I like doing it.
• BBBJ. Hygiene is important to me, so ladies you have nothing to worry about! Feels sooo much better than CBJ. Very important to me.
• Several reviews. She is a regular provider with some experience under her belt. A dozen good reviews can’t be wrong.
• Multi-hour discounts. I always prefer at least a 2 hour session and it’s nice if the second hour is discounted. A sign of professionalism on her part. I’m more likey to use the difference as a tip too!
• Nice website. FAQ. Calendar for when she travels. She’s a professional and takes her job seriously.
• Threeways. She knows someone else willing to threeway with the both of you, maybe a friend of hers or another provider. Preferably she’s bi in this case.
• Incall/Outcall. Willing to see you in different circumstances provided you let her know in time.

3. PSE: These girls are the ones I want to see the most. Any pornstar should provide at least this level of service. Non-pornstar providers who offer this level of service are not to be missed. They offer eveything a GFE offers and more. Few providers fall in this category.

• Greek. This is a defining characterisitc of PSE. I’m not the biggest Greek fan in the world, but it’s cool if its on the menu. I’m not always in the mood, but nice to know its available.
• CIM. This is more important to me than anything else. I love it! Main thing I search for. Don’t mind if a girl spits it out, but swallowing is so much cooler!
• DFK. Intense kissing, lots of tongue.
• Kinkiness. She’s open for fetishes, just ask.
• High-sexual energy. Read any review of Ava Devine http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=32225
• Highly reviewed. Everyone fucking loves her and everyone loves to fuck her! A hundred or more great reviews can’t be wrong.